General Circular No. 001326



To: Heads of State Agencies and Human Resource Directors



Subject: Proposed Adoption Of CS Rules 13.50 And 13.51



Issue Date: August 17, 1998



The State Civil Service Commission will hold a public hearing on Wednesday, September 2, 1998 to consider the proposed adoption of Civil Service Rules 13.50 and 13.51. The hearing will begin at 9:00 a.m. and will be held in the Department of Civil Service Second Floor Hearing Room, DOTD Annex Building, 1201 Capitol Access Road, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.



PROPOSED ADOPTION OF RULES 13.50 and 13.51.



13.50 Alternative Dispute Resolution; Pilot Program.



(a) The Appeals Division is authorized to pilot an Alternative Dispute Resolution Program and to establish its guidelines. The Appeals Division will submit the guidelines to the Commission for its approval.



(b) The purpose of the Alternative Dispute Resolution Program is to encourage the resolution of employment disputes without traditional adversarial hearings.



EXPLANATION



This rule will enable the Appeals Division to pilot Alternative Dispute Resolution programs and to establish guidelines for the pilot programs. For oversight purposes, the rule requires the guidelines to be submitted to the Commission for its approval.



The goal of any Alternative Dispute Resolution program is to resolve employment disputes without resorting to traditional adversarial hearings. Instead, appeals will be referred to mediation, which is the type of Alternative Dispute Resolution that the Appeals Division has chosen to begin the pilot program. Mediation is simply assisted settlement negotiation. Traditional hearings are emotionally draining and can damage an ongoing employment relationship. The sad reality is that co-workers and supervisors who testify against each other one day cannot function as an effective working group the next day.



A related goal of an Alternative Dispute Resolution program is to eliminate or reduce the need for witnesses at hearings, which would mean that few, if any, people have to disrupt their schedules. Traditional hearings are expensive and time consuming for a large number of people--many of whom are not parties to the dispute. The greatest expense is the cost of having witnesses (mostly state employees) appear at the hearing. The state loses the work that would have been performed if the witnesses had not been at a hearing and often has to pay overtime to provide coverage for employees attending hearings.



The guidelines will not be adopted as rules at this time. A pilot program will allow the Appeals Division to determine how well the guidelines work in practice and to make prudent changes. With the help of a pilot program, the Appeals Division can later recommend rules that work.



13.51 Mediation.



(a) The Commission or a Referee may direct the attorneys and the parties in an appeal to participate in mediation to attempt to resolve the appeal before a hearing.



(b) A member of the Commission, a Referee, or anyone appointed by the Commission or by the Chief Referee may conduct the mediation. The person who conducts the mediation must meet the Mediator qualifications established by the Appeals Division.



(c) The Mediator's role is to facilitate communication among the parties at the mediation. The Mediator will not later influence, participate in, or make any decision on any issue in the appeal. The Mediator will not issue any orders or sanctions pertaining to the mediation or the appeal.



(d) Before the mediation, the attorneys must confer with their clients about the clients' goals and expectations from settlement. The attorneys and every person whose authority is necessary for settlement must appear at the mediation (or, at the discretion of the Mediator, be available by telephone), on time and prepared to negotiate.



(e) The Commission, the Chief Referee, or the Referee presiding over the appeal may order the attorneys and/or the parties to bring to (or exchange before) the mediation a witness and exhibit list, relevant documents and/or exhibits, a proposed settlement offer, and anything else that will aid in resolving the appeal.



(f) The mediation will not be open to the public and will be confidential as established in the guidelines.



(g) If anyone fails to comply with an order pertaining to the mediation, the Commission or the Referee presiding over the appeal may order appropriate sanctions. Those sanctions may include punishing for contempt, dismissing the appeal or portions of it, reversing the action appealed or portions of it, and assessing costs and attorney's fees against the noncomplying person.



EXPLANATION



This rule provides the foundation for a successful mediation program. Paragraph (a) allows parties and their attorneys to be ordered to participate in mediation, and Paragraph (g) allows the person presiding over the case (NOT the Mediator) to sanction anyone who does not comply with an order pertaining to mediation. To evaluate the pilot program, the Appeals Division needs a random sample of cases, which would not result if the program were piloted on a purely voluntary basis or lacked sanctions for non-compliance.



Paragraph (b) establishes who may mediate and who may appoint a Mediator, and Paragraph (c) dictates that the Mediator is a facilitator, not a decision-maker. For the program to succeed, the parties must have confidence in the Mediator's competence and neutrality.



Paragraph (d) requires attorneys and parties to be prepared and to have someone with settlement authority available at the mediation, and Paragraph (e) allows the person presiding over the case (NOT the Mediator) to order production and/or exchange of documents and exhibits. Mediation can only succeed if the parties/attorneys are prepared and have the documents needed to evaluate their case and persons with settlement authority are available.



Paragraph (f) provides that the mediation is confidential. To achieve candor during the mediation process, the parties must be assured that nothing said in the mediation will ever be "held against them."



Persons interested in making comments relative to these proposals may do so at the public hearing or by writing to the Director of State Civil Service at Post Office Box 94111, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70804-9111.



Sincerely,









Allen H. Reynolds

Director